Customs Officials Deny French Scientist US Entry Over His Anti-Trump Texts
An FBI inquiry was briefly opened, then dropped, after which the scientist was deported to France.
United States border officials refused to allow a French scientist to enter the country after searching his electronic devices and discovering messages to his colleagues that were critical of President Donald Trump.
The scientist — whose name is currently unknown but reportedly works for France’s National Center for Scientific Research — was traveling to Houston, Texas, for a conference earlier this month. It’s unclear why border authorities stopped him, but upon searching his devices, they discovered text messages that one source told Agence France-Presse (AFP) were interpreted as displaying “hatred towards Trump” that could be “qualified as terrorism.”
The supposed threat of terrorism appears to have been short-lived: An FBI inquiry was opened into the matter but closed soon afterward. The scientist was still refused entry to the country, however, and was sent back to France the next day.
It’s unclear what specific statements prompted border agents to deny the scientist entry to the U.S. or even why the initial search was conducted. U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents are allowed to search the cellphones, computers, cameras and other electronic devices of any traveler — but such searches are incredibly rare, and are conducted for fewer than 1 in every 10,000 travelers arriving in the country.
Philippe Baptiste, France’s minister of higher education and research, decried the denial of entry and subsequent deportation of the individual.
“This measure was apparently taken by the American authorities because the researcher’s phone contained exchanges with colleagues and friends in which he expressed a personal opinion on the Trump administration’s research policy,” Baptiste said in a statement.
He added:
Freedom of opinion, free research, and academic freedom are values that we will continue to proudly uphold. I will defend the right of all French researchers to be faithful to them in accordance with the law.
There have been multiple examples of the Trump administration violating the free speech rights of noncitizens in the U.S., including people with green card status, like Mahmoud Khalil, and with student visas, like Badar Khan Suri. In this newest case involving the scientist, it appears that the Trump administration may expand their free speech crackdown to include refusing entry to travelers to the U.S. based on their political opinions — specifically, if they’re anti-Trump.
The scientist’s deportation comes one month after Vice President J.D. Vance chided a group of European leaders in Munich for supposedly being intolerant of speech from far right figures in their countries, including those espousing fascist and neo-Nazi viewpoints.
Vance then championed the White House for supposedly protecting speech rights — a claim that bears no merit, given that the Trump administration has targeted and detained multiple people who have expressed pro-Palestine views.
“In Washington, there is a new sheriff in town. And under Donald Trump’s leadership, we may disagree with your views, but we will fight to defend your right to offer them in the public square,” Vance claimed at that event.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 7 days to add 432 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.
